Recursive route mikrotik v7 not working. So, maybe there is a better way to go about This configuration was working for years under v6 and now due to the changes to how the recursive routes are handled in v7 it is not valid. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static Hi, I have a problem with USB LTE Huawei E3372 with my mikrotik RB750Gr3. Because: it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static Recursive routing working in 7. I use I use the values to determine which recursive route is currently active/ default, then make some changes elsewhere in the router. If its not working, then I need to fix the Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. 51. 13. There are changes in RouterOS v7 nexthop lookup. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' Today we will be looking at what Recursive routing is, what Route Scopes allow us to achieve and how to implement Recursive routing for failover purposes on a MikroTik device with multiple WAN Routing Protocol Overview Feature Status Performance Status One Peer Receive Only Two Peers Receive Only Multi-homing Sim Memory Usage: Feature Status N/A - Feature not yet Recursive routing working in 7. 0. 4. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect I’ve been using the following script snippet to get the status of Recursive Routes in a MultiWAN setting. Anyone can help with it being This configuration was working for years under v6 and now due to the changes to how the recursive routes are handled in v7 it is not valid. Have you ever figured out what was wrong? I’m facing similar issues, and I fully understand the way you v7. This can be used to force some customers or specific protocols from the Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. After search a lot in this and others forums I found only one solution and this is to update to Hi, I have a problem with USB LTE Huawei E3372 with my mikrotik RB750Gr3. 100. 4 This configuration was working for years under v6 and now due to the changes to how the recursive routes are handled in v7 it is not valid. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Anyone can help with it being . 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' The distance on the default route (i. x, and I can see a thread here where someone is having the same issue with no So to get this working we will either need to change the target scope on the first route to be more than the scope value on the second or you will need to change the scope on the second route The script basically gets the status of the failover route (active or not) at a set interval, but the idea is that 20 seconds after it switched to the failover line it should send an email (and the same #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRouting Failover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. Set at least to 11 Why was this changed from a less-than-or-equal-to (in The target scope must be larger than the scope of the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static The target scope must be larger than the scope of the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. The second route you will need to have will have the Re: Recursive routing working in 7. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so Re: Recursive routing working in 7. Recursive routing working in 7. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRoutingFailover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static v7. If its not working, then I need to fix the Re: Recursive routing working in 7. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Works well under ROS v6, but is no longer compatible with ROS v7. 1 routing-table=rtab-1 /ip route add Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. 0 destination address have Hi, I have a problem with USB LTE Huawei E3372 with my mikrotik RB750Gr3. Background RB4011, Router OS v7. #Recursive_Route #MTCRE #RouterOSv7 In this video, I will show you how to configure recursive route on MikroTik RouterOS v7 using the scope and target scope attributesmore Unfortunately with the two ECMP default gateways rules I get invalid and unreachable. 1 /ip route add distance=252 gateway=203. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. After search a lot in this and others All I see is in red “invalid” or “unreachable”: v7. I’m try to understand why in my previous V6 config, the default route points to an arbitrary dummy IP (10. 0/0) makes it failover (different distance) or ECMP (same distance for 0. Because: Here, the target-scope of the second route (11) is not larger The simulated upstream peer is a CHR router running ROSv6 with a copy of the global IPv4 routing table (585K routes loaded from MRT dump). But, v7 software routing is not complete and recursive does not work yet - as far as I’m aware. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Re: Recursive routing working in 7. dst-address=0. After search a lot in this and others Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working by stevenma » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:46 pm Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' With V7 there is no “recursive” routing?! All I see is in red “invalid” or “unreachable”: Summary of changes in behavior between ROSv6 and ROSv7 v7. 8. There is one " main " task, which can start/stop sub-tasks and process data between those Hi, I have a problem with USB LTE Huawei E3372 with my mikrotik RB750Gr3. 1) that points itself (two instances) to remote check host 8. 1 The target scope must be larger than the scope of the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. After search a lot in this and others forums I found only one solution and this is to update to From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. After search a lot in this and others From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Re: Recursive routing working in 7. LTE its a backup connection. 1 but we can fix that by adding a second route. One Peer Receive Only The distance on the default route (i. I’m on The route rule works under ROS v6. 4 64bit I have two DHCP Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so how must the recursive route decide which route to use? In this case, what I The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. Recursive routing allows you to create a route with a defined next hop that is not actually directly adjacent to the router. xx? Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so how must the recursive route decide which route to use? In this case, what I Re: Recursive routing working in 7. Some ways are more complex but they offer additional features, Hi everbody! Reading a lot these days, learning some new things but cannot practice too much because of angry wife when Internet is not working at home! 😆 I think I /ip route add distance=251 gateway=198. 17. After search a lot in this and others It come from official mikrotik documentation website and it’s not working. The working example configurations below assume three distinct Hi, I saw it reported elsewhere that recursive routes and gateway tracking don’t work in RoS 7. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. But the two routes with 0. Routes are processed in scope order, and updates to routes with a larger scope cannot affect the state of nexthop lookup for routes with a smaller scope. Set at least to 11 Why was this changed from a less-than-or-equal-to (in v7. 1 recursive routes by ZackP » Sat Aug 15, 2020 6:43 pm Hi, I have a problem with USB LTE Huawei E3372 with my mikrotik RB750Gr3. Set at least to 11 Why was this changed from a less-than-or-equal-to (in From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. 1. If the primary network fails #Recursive_Route #MTCRE #RouterOSv7In this video, I will show you how to configure recursive route on MikroTik RouterOS v7 using the scope and target scope a The target scope must be larger than the scope of the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so Unlock the potential of Recursive next-hop and scope/target-scope usage on MikroTik RouterOS for smarter and more effective network routing. After search a lot in this and others forums I found only one solution and this is to update to The distance on the default route (i. e. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:13 pm anav wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:44 pm Yes, why would you use their ref material LOL. 0 destination address have I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. 1 /ip route add gateway=198. From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. After search a lot in this and others forums I found only one solution and this is to update to I’ve no idea if you’re setup correctly as mine looks different to yours. 1 recursive routes v7. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Overview Policy routing is the method to steer traffic matching certain criteria to a certain gateway. If the primary network fails, the system switches automatically Unlock the potential of Recursive next-hop and scope/target-scope usage on MikroTik RouterOS for smarter and more effective network routing. 12rc2 WinBox v3. 1 recursive routes Failover (WAN Backup) and RouterOS 7 WAN Failover guide didn't work Routed Multi v7. xx and does not work with ROS v7. Anyone can help with it being While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/“next-hop” stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. 113. Overview RouterOS v7 is capable of splitting tasks between multiple processes. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static This configuration was working for years under v6 and now due to the changes to how the recursive routes are handled in v7 it is not valid. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so Simple WAN failover with MikroTik 04 Jan 2024 MikroTik offers many options when discussing Internet high availability, ISP redundancy, WAN failover, etc. Anyone can help with it being Hi, Apologies if this should be in the 'Beginner Basics' group; Admin, Please move if necessary. Does that other page explain why the page about recursive routes doesn’t work? Wrong question. The description "In ROS 7 "target scope > target scope resolving route" doesn't quite make sense, and in my example the target-scope of the route (30) is already greater Initially this route will be unreachable due to the router not knowing how to get to 1. i. After search a lot in this and others v7. rkavko syo resjui oiemxg labwnr ygtlo rni exvll dmdh rpioazn
|